Feed on
Posts
Comments

Oooh, so I see that our dear friend Heart — she of the “you can be a political lesbian even if you’ve got 11 kids thanks to Quiverfull and used to hang with Daddy Dobson” stripe — has got a new blog, “FIGHT THE LIES” (I ain’t linking, she gets no traffic from me) about how the meany, nasty trans women and women of color are just being so MEANZ to her.

Daisy has an excellent takedown of this latest shite. I really can’t add anything to this. But I do note that Daisy’s post has a picture of Heart, and I urge you to take a gander.

Heart looks rather femme, yeah?

Well, let’s make some popcorn, and put Heart and Twisty Faster into a room together and lock the door.

They’re both self-proclaimed radfems, yes?

Well, we’ve a problem. Because Heart’s femme presentation violates the rules and regulations of the Twistylution. Twisty’s gonna tell Heart that she is an enemy of women everywhere, b/c she wears dresses and v-neck tops and jewelry and is therefore sucking the c*ck of the Pat. Heart’s going to tell Twisty that no that’s wrong, she (Heart) can wear dresses, but the meany ev0l trans women can’t. Twisty will attempt to revoke Heart’s Advanced Pat-Blamer Card.

Sit back and watch, folks, as two white, land-owning, privileged radical feminists fight to the death. Dueling whiteradfem ideologies, wow.

Heart will do it for the fundraising. After all, she must still have a downed tree somewhere on her acreage (or more trinkets to buy with her “plane fare” or something). Twisty need not worry, she’s got her horses to provide the muscle to clear brush on her big-ass ranch.

Also, Ren Ev takes down mAndrea, one of Heart’s bff’s.

Leave me the fuck out of your fucking carnival.

Why? Because you link to hateful transphobic shit, and publish comments full of hateful transphobic shit. More from Cara and drakyn. I am not linking to CoF.

philobiblon: Do you not bother to read the posts that you are linking? Or do you just not give a shit how many women are hurt by your enabling of this hate? And do you see, or care about, the hypocrisy of linking a post by a committed ally of trans* folk (Cara / The Curvature) in the same carnival?

To future hosts of CoF: Do not link any of my posts to your carnival. I will not participate in any forum that enables this kind of vile hate. If you link any of my posts, or put me on your blogroll, I will file suit if I have to get you to delink me.

  • When a person’s living will, which you have on file, specifically states that ze does not want to be resuscitated, why do you then totally ignore hir clearly stated wishes and jam a ventilator tube down hir throat? And why must hir designated surrogate then fight you for *hours* until you finally remove the ventilator?
  • When a person gets cancer, why do you always push for treatment (multiple courses of chemo and radiation, for instance) that will make that person very sick and destroy their quality of life, when you know that the form of cancer is incurable? What is so important about extending life a few months when that person spends those extra months throwing up? Why can you not simply present treatment as an option, without privileging it over hospice / comfort care, alternative medicine, etc, and let the patient make up hir own mind*? Are you threatened when a patient rejects your heroic efforts and chooses instead to die in comfort and in hir own home?
  • Less critically, how are you able to tell patients (and their families) that they are going to die?  How can you watch them die, and keep your sanity?  Do you cry when you get home?

* I’m not judging or criticizing those who choose to fight their cancer with allopathic medicine. What I’m objecting to is doctors presenting this as the only, or the only reasonable, choice.

Leaving

You are leaving soon. You have told us that you must leave, walk through that door, into another state of being, that none of us can hope to understand until we too walk through that door.

I thought you would be here forever. I thought that I’d continue to watch you grow, watch you take one small step after another to escape the rigid structures that your upbringing imposed upon you.

But, some months ago, your guide for that other state, came into your life. Ze said that you had a little time, that you could put up a good fight, but that the time would come for you to pass through the door.

I’m going to miss you.

It’s just not fair.

…not.

I can’t say it better than Jack does.

I will just add - SSM doesn’t do fuck-all to help me to get medical care from people who will actually treat me as a human, rather than a worthless freak. And it won’t help people like Erica Keels or Sanesha Stewart, either.

Know This

I am a woman.

You claim exclusive rights to set the boundaries, shift them to whatever suits you at the moment, and use whatever weapons are at your disposal to defend them. You expect me to twist and splinter myself into something I am not, so that you may remain comfortable.

I do not need to justify myself to you. I have no use for your approval or understanding. I do not accept the conditions you seek to impose.

You are out in the woods, setting traps for me wherever you go. I am swimming in the sea. You cannot hope to understand my world.

[Edit: A commenter has informed me that I misidentified the college of one of the presenters. The presenter is from the University of St. Francis in Ilinois, not St. Francis University in Pennsylvania. I've made the correction below. Thanks to Anita for this correction, and my apologies to her and St. Francis University of PA.]

I went to a technical (web-related) conference in Gettysburg, PA last week. While the subject matter was of interest to me, I did have some … issues.

First, a few observation about the town.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a higher concentration of Confederate flags anywhere in the US, including the South. There’s history, of course, but really, do we need Confederate flags flying on every other knick-knack store? Or posted in the windows? Or on t-shirts?

A local paper reported that the local school district has repeatedly denied a bilingual (Spanish / English) charter school’s application to operate in the district. (*All* of the school’s students would spend half of each day in Spanish-language immersion.) The charter-school staffers have contorted themselves to try to meet the arbitrary, shifting “requirements” of the school district. It looks to me like the school board is just plain racist (”can’t have our kids learn Spanish, they might think that those ev0l brown people are humans!”), they just don’t come out and *say* it.

On to the “welcoming committee”: I arrived in town just as school let out, and there was a long line of school buses on the other side of the street. Some young-ish guy darts out from between the buses, in front of my car. I slammed on my brakes. He got mad at me for daring to not hit him, and yelled “You have the right of way, BITCH!!!” Well, at least he got my gender right. (Somewhat related story: A rather butch woman that I know was called “faggot” by somebody. She responded, “You’re almost right!”)

On to the conference.

Among the attendees, men outnumbered women three to one, and the men generally had positions with more authority and visibility. In the sessions and keynote speeches that I went to, there was one woman presenter (out of about a dozen presenters; some of the sessions had more than one).

The racial imbalance was even more intense. About 95% of the attendees were white, and the only POC were east or south Asian. All of the presenters that I saw were white, as were all but one of the college I/T staff on hand (one guy, in desktop support, was Black). Is it the location in Gettysburg? The culture at the college and the conference? The I/T field itself? I’d guess it’s a combination; the proportion of women and POC in I/T is quite low to begin with, but I’ve rarely seen such a lily-white crowd.

For myself, I felt out-of-place. Most people conformed pretty closely to majority-culture norms in dress and presentation; most men were appropriately masculine, and most women appropriately feminine and conventionally attractive. The few young, non-macho men and non-heteronormative women seemed mostly uncomfortable and quiet. I felt very out of place with my black-and-orange hair, facial piercings, and low-rise jeans, and I definitely got some hostile vibes.

There were a few sessions I want to mention. One was presented by three men. All of them were very macho, using sports and armed-forces metaphors all over the place. One in particular was verbally abusive towards many of his co-workers (who were in absentia). He called one developer who was struggling with a programming problem a “jerk” and “idiot”. He then stated that some other developers had concerns about a particular piece of software and dared to ask questions about it. The presenter referred to them, in a very derisive and mocking tone, as “a bunch of geeks”. I walked out at that point.

Out of about 15 attendees, there were only two women, including myself. The other woman walked out after less than ten minutes. I left after about half an hour. I guess there were so few women there because this guy has a rep. Note: He was from University of St. Francis in Illinois, and an I/T manager. I can’t imagine it’d be a good experience working in that department.

The next session was also presented by a man (from University of Georgia). It was the only session that I went to where women attendees outnumbered men. The presenter was respectful of everybody, female and male, including myself (he did gender me wrong, but I do present kind of androgynously and have a deep voice, so that’s a common mistake people make). I suspect that he, too, has a rep — a much better one.

I noticed that the one woman who presented (from Southwestern University in Austin, TX) did not seem very self-confident, as compared to the men. It’s not suprising; white, middle-class women are largely acculturated to be self-doubting and reticent, and some are more successful at overcoming that than others; on the other hand, men don’t *have* to overcome that; their self-confidence is rewarded continuously. The presenter’s job was quite difficult; she had one year to implement a major software package and do a lot of customization, by herself, with little support from her department; as part of that, she had to learn several programming languages in a trial-by-fire fashion. It was an incredible accomplishment, something that she rightly can take pride in, and it pisses me off that society puts so much pressure on women to downplay their own intellectual accomplishments and lose their self-confidence, especially in male-dominated fields.

If you define yourself in opposition to men, and everything you say or do must therefore be the exact opposite of what men like / are turned on by or what men do, is this not still allowing yourselves to be defined by men?  If your reaction to The Pat demanding that you wear lipstick is to refuse to wear lipstick, are you not still letting The Pat / men tell you what to do?

Would it be such a big freakin’ disaster if you defined yourselves for yourselves?  And let other women do the same?  Because I fail to see how defining one’s self as the exact opposite of Class Man constitutes refusal to participate in the oppressive system.  And I fail to see how engaging in slut-shaming and rape-apology is not direct participation in the oppressive system.

Besides, since the members of Class Man are each unique individuals — even if many of them do actively participate in maintaining oppressive structures* — then what each man does or each man wants or each man is turned on by differs from one man to the next.  It must be awfully confusing trying to figure out what each man wants so that you can avoid doing anything that Class Man wants.

I mean, if y’all meet a couple of dudes that are turned on by women who wear loose, non-low-rise jeans and flannel shirts and Doc Marten’s and absolutely no makeup, what are you going to do?  Start wearing skirts and heels?

(P.S.  I’m sure that your favorite candidate *cough*Heart*cough* will garner at least a few votes from the Festies.  Best of luck.  “I will allocate ten trillion dollars for research and development of parthenogenesis.  Addressing racism can wait.”)

* Do I have to remind anybody that there are many, many oppressive structures besides The Pat, and that women participate in maintaining them to much the same extent as men?

[ETA - See edit at end of post.]

(Strong, and I do mean STRONG, trigger and NSFW warnings apply to all content below the fold.)

I’m not quite ready to apply the sex-positive label to myself just yet, mainly of my (hopefuly diminshing) ignorance of issues regarding sex work and non-”normative” sex (polyamory, kink, etc), but I’m getting there. Just eight months ago, I was quoting Andrea Dworkin with abandon. Now, not so much.

I’m rambling, folks. And, please be sure to read the NOTE at the bottom of the post, because I’ll be watching comments closely.

Continue Reading »

Dear Noam Chomsky:

In the name of the G-ddess’s Green Earth, how can you possibly call yourself a progressive and, yet be so ignorant of and dissociated from the world around you that you have no idea of what type of magazine Hustler is, nor even be able to guess from the name, when they do an interview with you?

And, given that, how can you possibly feel justified in making blanket pronouncements about The Universal Evil Of Porn!!!111eleven!!! and those who work in that field?

For that matter, how can you feel justified about making any statements about popular culture (of which porn is a part) to which you admit to being clueless about?

I trust this couple way the hell more than I trust you.

I don’t mind people who have their heads in the sand. I *do* mind it when they get all sanctimonious about things they know nothing about.

FFS, Robert Jensen may be a total wankstain, but at least he knows that Hustler is a porn mag (it’s probably part of his extensive…uhhm…*research*…into Teh Evolz Of Pr0n).

[ETA]: I’ve realized that the above paragraph about Jenson implies that he is somehow “better than” Chomsky. Just to clarify, that the Chomsky thing is (so far at least) an isolated incident, and the intent of my post was to comment on his judgementalness based on willful ignorance.

In terms of overall impact, though, Jensen’s discourse has a much greater impact on sex workers in particular, and in general on everybody (women and men) who violate the extremely narrow parameters that cultural feminists have deemed as “acceptable” behavior, thinking, opinions, etc.

Older Posts »